Film Reviews


A R Rahman and Film Reviews09 Sep 2006 10:05 am

No! I take back my words! It is not a gender-changed remake of HDDCS! I don’t want to insult HDDCS. Not that HDDCS was a classic, but “Silly”ana oru kadhai oops sorry “Sillunu Oru Kadhal” is not even anywhere near it. HDDCS and Silly (Short for “Sillunu Oru Kadhal”) have only one thing in common – legendary music. Period.

Not only was my evening ruined, I ruined it for my in-laws too. Is there any provision under the Indian judiciary to sue the film-makers for attempt to mass extreme mental torture? “Silly” will be first movie to go into that list whenever they make the provision. When the movie ends, there is a slide “Written and Directed by Krishna” as if he has made “Titanic” or something. Bugger Krishna, you better stay indoors for a good amount of time, atleast till Kollywood has a hit and forgets this divine offering of yours!

The story: Surya(Gowtham) marries Jyothika(imaginatively named Kundali) in a village. They move to Mumbai after marriage. And we are 6 years fast forward into the future where Gowtham is a chief mechanic at the Maruti Suzuki plant while Kundali works in a jazzy office with well-done-up-interiors and females running around everywhere. They have a daughter, Ishu, who is 5 years old – that cute kid who is the brand ambassador for all the silk shops in Pondy Bazaar. Gowtham daily drops the kid at school, Kundali at office and head to Gurgaon Haryana and back in his Maruti Swift! Shocked? Check this out, Maruti Suzuki’s only manufacturing plant is in Gurgaon!

Well, if I continue with my nit-picking in the movie, then this review can never end. So, I will let them pass. Let me get on with the story. Kundali reads Gowtham’s diary (bad manners?!) to take the story further. Gowtham was in love with a girl called Ishwarya aka Ishu (Bhoomika) during his engineering days (@ PSB Engineering College, Coimbatore. Probably PSG Tech, the original, didn’t need a product placement ala Maruti since they are already a force to reckon with in the Country!). Ishu was the daughter of an MP – docile and studious while Gowtham was the typical LLB (Lord of Last Bench) at college playing football, driving fancy bikes and drinking beer like water (or was it water itself?!). The way and the context in which she discloses her love for him is so out-of-place and out-of-imagination that I wanted to literally go and shout carefully chosen expletives at the director. Then, what happens? Even that kid Ishu will tell you. Big Ishu and Gowtham get married at the registered office and right there, Big Ishu’s bigger father comes and you have a fight scene where Gowtham is beaten till he is almost dead.

But guess what? The healthcare services in Coimbatore are so good that within days there are no scars on Gowtham’s face where he was beaten with a hockey stick or something similar(that I remember this much is a credit to me!). Just when Gowtham was about to recover and charge to search for Ishu, his chitappa (uncle) falls from the staircase. Probably he had also had enough of the movie. So, he decided to take a fatal fall. But before dying he takes a promise from Gowtham (like all good characters) that he will live a noble life ever after with that girl called “Kundali” from the village.

If you haven’t smashed your monitor to pieces, I shall dare to continue. Maybe I need to call for insurance. Thinking of insurance, I can suggest a new product to the insurance companies. They can insure movie-goers like us against bad movies like these. But yeah, there’s every probability they might go bankrupt if one person like Krishna decides to take them on!

Anyways story is story. I have suffered for 3 hours plus commuting time also, please share my suffering like good friends! After reading all this from the diary, Kundali lands up in Coimbatore in search of Big Ishu. She arranges for Big Ishu to come to Mumbai to spend a “Day” with Gowtham. You know why? In that diary Gowtham would have written, “Even if I had spent a day of my life with you, I would have had the pleasure of having lived for ages. But that was not to be.”

Now what happens in that day? How does Krishna The Great manage to waste your time completely? I forgot the name of the producer, but very soon we will hear of someone going underground unable to bear the wrath of audience and I will know who is the producer. This producer hasn’t paid anyone except Krishna. A R Rahman would anyway deliver. Money or otherwise!

Surya and Jo wanted to give their audience a memorable movie before they enter into wedlock the day after tomorrow. Well, they have achieved their objective. This movie is memorable in more ways than one.

Memorable way #1: The guy sitting in the row in front of me, at one point during the movie, shouted, “I could have rather thrown this Rs. 100/- down the drain!”. The sheer hopelessness of the situation was evident in his voice.

Memorable way #2: Another guy, at a considerably important scene in the movie, “Vaaak Thooooo!!”. I don’t think he only spat anger out!

Memorable way #3: Two intelligent people, 15 minutes before the ending, walked out of the theatre so that they could take their vehicles away easily out of the theatre. I did have a brotherly feeling toward them!

Finally, since my wife fervently pleaded with me that I shouldn’t give a single star rating on my blog for a “Surya” movie, I am going to rate it mathematically. Paapi pet ka sawaal hai yar, samjha karo!

My rating: ***** – **** (That’s 5 stars minus 4 stars)

Legend:
*Stay at home
**If you have the time to kill, go ahead, but not recommended
***Watch if you are a film buff!
****Go watch it on the big screen!
*****Don’t miss watching this one on the big screen! Avoid piracy!

Film Reviews06 Sep 2006 11:45 am

The core team [Rajkumar Hirani, Vidhu Vinod Chopra, Sanjay Dutt, Arshad Warsi, Bomman Irani and Jimmy Shergill] and concept [Hardhitting and throught-provoking messages through sentimental but class comedy!] of “Lage Raho Munnabhai” is the same as its prequel “Munnabhai. M.B.B.S”. But, this sequel stands on its own as another legend in Indian cinema.

Making a classic first-up might be easy a la “DCH” by Farhan Akhtar and following it up with a good but not as classy “Lakshya” is easier and doing a remake of an already established hit “Don” is the easiest. Even RGV is following the same pattern with “Shiva 2006″. It would have been very easy for Hirani and team to follow the same pattern and ensure a box office hit. But they have really done it the right way. “Sachchayi ke raaste pe chale hain”! And the output is really commendable. No not commendable, outstanding.

Munnabhai and Sirkeet (it’s actually circuit, but in mumbaiya you know…) are busy going about their bhaigiri business. No baggage from the prequel of doctors is ever brought in here. In fact you don’t even expect it. You are just so busy cracking up in laughter and stamping the floor with your feet in roaring laughter to the wit of Sirkeet and the put-on innocence of Munnabhai that you are totally into the movie by the time the first act is done. It is adequately known that they work for Lakhbir Singh aka Lucky (Bomman Irani) and help the builder build an infrastructure empire while Munnabhai is head-over-heels in love with a Radio Jockey called “Jhanavi”.

Then, Munnabhai poses as Professor Murali Prasad Sharma and cracks a quiz on Mahatma Gandhi that has “Meet Jhanavi in her studio” as a prize. The cracking of the quiz is as hillarious an act as are the “sambhodit” & “vinambra” ones. Munnabhai is subsequently invited home by Jhanavi to preach the old men in her house on “Gandhiji”. Now, Munnabhai is in yet another predicament. A kind of predicament that is very familiar to the audience by now. And just when you are expectingthe old wine of “Munnabhai. M.B.B.S” to be served from the new bottle, the movie takes you by surprise and throws you into a roller-coaster ride of emotions, mostly funny though. And the tearful moments brought a tear to my eye. And when the movie ended I found the audience doing a move in sync of wiping tears that have settled at the corner of their eyes waiting to slide down their cheeks. I wanted to clap after the movie was over, but I didn’t. Next time, I will. Yes, the movie is worth watching twice!

The hard-hitting messages in the movie is the hero. The humour is the heroine. And the way that they have hit a unique chemistry or chemical locha [lol!] is where the credit goes to the director. Everyone else is just a character unlike typical hindi cinema where stars take over. I still remember Jeh dot Asthana from “Munnabhai. M.B.B.S”. Now, I will remember the love-to-be-photographed model Lucky Singh! The character makes you laugh here, not the stars, and that’s why the emotions are so genuine.

Rajkumar Hirani and Vidhu Vinod Chopra have written a story that’s ‘brave’ in plain words! To weave humour and emotion into it means you have so much of confidence on your dialogue writers [Rajkumar Hirani and Abhijat Joshi] that they will carry it with aplomb. And man, have they succeeded?! I still laugh when I recollect a few scenes like “Please send a get well soon card to Lucky Singh, woh bahut bhimaar hai”. And the scene just before interval when Munnabhai says “Apun sorry hai re”, I cried then and I can feel the goosebumps while typing this!

Rajkumar Hirani is a director I am now going to nominate as the most worthy successor to hrishi da. Well, he is just been nominated. Not yet there. Two movies of his are classics and worthy of buying original DVDs and preserving for a lifetime. If he can come up with another one at this level, then he might be well up there. Great show Sir! Your style of movie-making is brilliant and the messages you sent across in both of them are not miss-able. We get the point. And very well too! Thanks!

Vidhu Vinod Chopra, thanks to you we now have another school of films coming up. The school of sensible and wholesome entertainment. Please keep at it with these genre of movies and I am sure we will not remember you as a great showman but as a superb producer. I also hope you regain your touch of movie-making and give us more movies like “Parinda”.

Shantanu Moitra’s music is another highlight of the movie. After “Hazaron Khwaishen Aisi”, “Parineeta” and “Yahaan”, this is his fourth movie. And he does a classy job yet again. As classy as the movie itself. My pick is the “pal pal” song. Amazing! And this movie creates another niche in music also. The songs are not typical “pallavi-charanam” kind of arrangement. They have conversations embedded in them and that takes the flavour of the movie forward. Shantanu Moitra’s job was more difficult in that aspect and he comes on tops in that too.

The chemistry between Arshad Warsi and Sanjay Dutt is what makes the movie click. It’s astonishing how they continue to find that wavelength and make us laugh and cry at will. Here like a good sequel, the great bonding between Munna and Sirkeet is established. The total acceptance of Munna by Sirkeet is a potrait painted very well. And when they tell you what’s right and what’s not, you are found nodding your head in total agreement!

Jhanavi played by the effervescent Vidya Balan endears you to her. You begin to love the way she says, “Good Moooooooorning Mumbai” as much as Munna loves it. You are in love with her when Munna is and you are watiing to see when she falls out of it just because Munna lied to her on being a professor. She is lovable and cute. Sweet and fresh. Vidya Balan continues from “Parineeta”. My nomination for the successor to Madhuri Dixit’s throne.

Bomman Irani is at his customary best playing the idiosyncratic sardar. Though he plays the bad guy; the comic touch provided to the character through his mannerisms and obsessions are such a great addition to the character that your heart goes out to him at the end. The sound of signing a deal, the poses to take photographs, the conversations with munna and sirkeet are all something that only Bomman Irani can carry off. My nomination for the successor to the long vacant Great Utpal Dutt’s throne.

Jimmy Shergill, Saurabh Shukla, Khulbhushan Kharbanda and Diya Mirza play small roles with significant impact on the movie. Everyone is noticed. Everyone has an impact.

Overall, a movie that’s in the league of eternal, superlative comedy. I would also go ahead and stick my neck out saying it is in the league of “Golmaal” and “Chupke chupke”. Go and watch it on the big screen. If you miss it, I can promise you that you cannot spend those two and a half hours in a better way. And the message that you get from the movie, you will carry it for a lifetime. A promise. “Bole toh mamu mat ban, jaake dekh ke aa aur bata tere dimaag main kya chemical locha hua bhidu!”

My Rating: *****

Legend:
*Stay at home
**If you have the time to kill, go ahead, but not recommended
***Watch if you are a film buff!
****Go watch it on the big screen!
*****Don’t miss watching this one on the big screen! Avoid piracy!

Links:
Official website
Official Blog
IMDB for Lage Raho Munnabhai(2006)

Film Reviews18 Aug 2006 04:49 pm

Another one from Blogical Conclusion. Thought of writing one myself. But when your mind has been expressed so beautifully by someone else, you don’t need to waste energy writing the whole thing out. So here it is.

SILLUNU ORU KADHAL
The New Sunday Express – August 13, 2006

IF you’ve ever wondered what it would be like if Cole Porter wrote for Tamil movies, here it is – the title track from Sillunu Oru Kadhal, sung by Tanvi. Paravaigal seyyudhe, pattampoochi seyyudhe… kadhal, she goes, and you only have to translate this to get the mood of Birds do it, bees do it, the opening lines of Porter’s Let’s do it (let’s fall in love), which was immortalised by Ella Fitzgerald in her songbook dedicated to the composer. AR Rahman’s arrangements, though, don’t evoke the dreamy languor of that oldie. Instead, he sets these words to spunky, sprightly, bite-sized bebop riffs; the result comes across as a brassier version of his own Vennila (Iruvar) routed through Dizzy Gillespie’s Oh-Sho-Be-Do-Be. How this number will play in Athipatti I do not know, but it’s fantastic to have Rahman back at his playful best – especially in Tamil cinema, especially when it appeared that he was stashing away the good stuff for the biggies of Bollywood.

The experimentation, the refusal to stick to a winning (or safe) formula is evident even in the not-so-great numbers. The steamy Maja Maja – sung by the dependably-wonderful Shreya Ghoshal along with SPB Charan (who sounds remarkably like his father) – kicks off with guttural clicks, and as Ghoshal croons the opening stanza, Charan oh-so-casually joins her for a line and takes leave just as offhandedly. The dance-ready Machakari (Shankar Mahadevan, Vasundhara Das) has the strangest interludes, one with ghostly vocal harmonising and another full of poppish, faux-African chanting. And Maaricham (Carolisa, Mohammad Aslam, Krishna) is Chandralekha (Thiruda Thiruda) updated to the techno-trance era, where someone – for some reason – begins chanting the name Gautam to the accompaniment of Enigma-like, new-agey music. After this, it’s almost a relief to listen to Ammi Mithichachu (Sirgazhi Sivachidambaram, Swarnalatha, Naresh Iyer, Theni Kunjaramma, Vignesh), a conventional – but catchy – folk tune that’s handed down like a baton from one singer to the next as it races to an explosive finish.

The eminently rewind-worthy Munbe Vaa (Shreya Ghoshal, Naresh Iyer) is a heady love duet whose prelude sets off bubbles of synth-sounds and strings that float through the number, playing tag with the voices. And New York Nagaram has got to be one of the most stylish, least sentimental boy-misses-girl ballads ever. Vaali’s evocative lyrics – vaan ingey, neelam angey, he writes, likening a lonelyheart to a sky that’s lost its blueness – are so casually tossed off by Rahman, they made me imagine the composer with his hands dug deep into the pockets of his jeans, ambling around a snowed-in Big Apple with a broken heart. And the sadness is contagious. Things come together with such a satisfying click – from the masterful use of the female backup singers to the soulful sax interludes – you can’t help looking back at Rahman’s recent Tamil soundtracks and feel a twinge that it’s been so long since he crafted for us such a beauty.

Film Reviews18 Aug 2006 04:29 pm

A very fine review of “KANK”. This is a more balanced one than my playful SMS review bashing up the movie. Thought I should put it up here. Picked this one up from Blogical Conclusions. A blog I regularly follow for reviews.

HEART DIRECTOR
The New Sunday Express – August 13, 2006
Karan Johar’s latest is too long, too weepy, but it’s nonetheless the meatiest romantic melodrama in a while.

KARAN JOHAR’S plots can typically be summed up with a one-liner question: Will Shah Rukh Khan get together with X? Will Shah Rukh Khan get together with Kajol (in Kuch Kuch Hota Hai)? Will Shah Rukh Khan get together with his estranged family (in Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham)? And so, as Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna – or KANK, as it’s come to be known – began to unfold, and I saw that its one-line plot is whether Shah Rukh Khan (playing Dev) will get together with Rani Mukerji (as Maya), I thought this was going to be just another milking of the same, old formula. I expected a few surprises, sure, for Johar is nothing if not an expert at spinning fresh variations on familiar clichés – that’s why those who don’t care for clichés don’t care for Johar’s cinema – but what I didn’t expect is Bollywood’s most mature, most messy romance since the younger Sridevi set eyes on father-figure Anil Kapoor in Lamhe.

The messiness is due to the fact that Dev and Maya are both married – to fashion-magazine-editor Ria (Preity Zinta) and PR guy Rishi (Abhishek Bachchan) respectively – and the maturity is because their spouses aren’t Ranjeet and Bindu clones who drink and smoke and sleep around. It’s quite the opposite, really – Ria loves Dev, and Rishi loves Maya. But like in all marriages, problems crop up, and that’s when Dev and Maya begin a tentative friendship, only to realise they may actually be made for each other. And here’s the kicker: they’re made for each other because they’re the losers in their respective marriages. They’re the cowards, the ones with the hang-ups, the ones who’d rather wallow and seethe inside than take a step to set things right outside. Even when they start seeing each other, they do it so bloodlessly, it comes as no surprise when Maya gives Dev a kiss and immediately wipes the traces of lipstick off his cheek. They barely seem capable of acknowledging this relationship to themselves, let alone others.

When was the last time you saw a big, commercial, name-heavy Hindi movie where the hero and the heroine are portrayed as less charismatic, less fun, more whiny and weepy than the supporting characters (in this case, the people they are married to)? I can’t remember – and that’s just one of the ways KANK messes with your expectations of whom to identify with, whom to root for. Maya has a monster chip on her shoulder about being childless, and that’s probably why she treats Rishi like a child – cleaning up after him, chiding him for not being serious, and possibly being more than a little envious about the carefree way he goes through life. Dev too has the weight of the world on his shoulders. He was once a star soccer player, but after an accident, he’s reduced to being a soccer coach for a little league team, and he resents that Ria is more successful than he is. As opposed to these mopey sad-sacks, Rishi and Ria are so full of positive energy, so accepting of life as it comes, you like them far more than you do Dev and Maya. Yes, you feel sorry that the latter have their problems, but you wish they’d get over them and get on with their lives – the way grownups do.

Then again, it’s true that losers deserve love too, even if it’s not the kind of love that’s terribly exciting to watch unfold before your eyes. KANK is a very, very long movie – Johar really needs to get himself a more ruthless editor; he’s never content to let a moment pass without lingering on it after the mood is long gone, nor is he happy with dialogue when he can instead have declarations lasting long after they’ve made their point – and yet the length, after a while, began to feel somewhat right. Dev and Maya aren’t the kind who’d make tough decisions easily; it would seem that they would take a very long time to overcome their insecurities and their doubts and their wishy-washiness and take the positive step (for them) of breaking up their marriages, if they can bring themselves to do that at all. And I must tell you, for something that begins with such broad humour – some of it downright atrocious; some of it cannily reflective of how laughably pathetic Dev and Maya are – KANK so darkens in tone towards the end and becomes so gloomily unpredictable, I wasn’t quite sure if Dev and Maya would ever end up together. This is a mainstream movie, and mainstream movie convention demands that the hero and heroine ride off (or fly off or sail off or take a train) into the sunset. But mainstream movie convention also demands that people don’t walk out of marriages to loving spouses to pursue selfish affairs of the heart, and that our top stars don’t risk audience alienation. Maya is played by our current Heroine No. 1 – the adorable Babli, for crying out loud! – so you wonder if the writers will fiddle around with her image by making her leave Rishi. She may not want to sleep with him anymore, but she still loves him (and, more importantly, he’s besotted with her) – so will we be able to take her side if she decides to hurt him? After all, it isn’t that he’s wrong for her so much as he isn’t right for her.

What’s more startling is what they do with our Hero No. 1. Shah Rukh has always been the hero most in touch with his feminine side – the word for that these days, I think, is metrosexual – but he goes a step further in KANK and gives us a man who is borderline emasculated. Dev is filled with insecurity and resentment and petty jealousy (mostly towards Ria), and there’s nothing he can do about it – at least till he meets Maya. The way I saw it, he’s the classic Indian MCP who can’t handle a hard-nosed career woman like Ria; he needs a soft, sensitive, sari-clad homemaker like Maya to make him feel like a man again. Even Maya’s profession is non-threatening; she teaches little kids at a school. In contrast, Ria doesn’t have the time to attend her own kid’s soccer match; like overworked fathers usually do, she bribes the child with a PlayStation to say she’s sorry. But KANK, remarkably, doesn’t brand her a bitch. We actually sympathise with her when she observes, in one of the film’s many pointed bits of dialogue, “Main Arjun ki maa nahin ban saki kyonki mujhe uska baap banna pada.” (She couldn’t be a mother to her child because she had to become the father.) Yet, under that necessary armour of steel, Ria is a woman. When Dev and Maya finally admit to their spouses that they are in love, Rishi flies into a rage and begins to break things around the house, while Ria remains calm and collected. Rishi wants to know if Maya enjoyed sleeping with Dev, but Ria asks Dev if he’s in love with Maya; the man is more concerned with the sexual aspect of the betrayal while Ria, all woman, tries to come to grips with the emotional implications.

With all this, it’s no surprise that Preity (looking quite spectacular) and Abhishek come off far better – even in their abbreviated parts – than Shah Rukh and Rani, who really aren’t asked to do anything here that they haven’t done earlier (and better). Bachchan Jr., in particular, is the great jolt of energy the movie sorely needs every once in a while. (Bachchan Sr. is there too, in a charming little role as a naughty old man who’s the film’s conscience.) Abhishek brings the house down in a couple of song sequences that are dazzlingly put together – especially the sixties’-themed Rock N Roll Soniye, where he boogies with women costumed in billowing Marilyn Monroe skirts (you know, like in The Seven Year Itch) and figure-hugging Mumtaz saris (you know, like in Brahmchari’s Aaj kal tere mere pyar ke charche). Shankar-Ehsaan-Loy’s best number – Mitwa – is also nicely used to underline the growing friendship between Dev and Maya, but the title track is somewhat wasted. When it begins, everything around Maya and Dev turns blue, which we’ve just learnt is her favourite colour. It’s as if, having finally accepted her love for Dev, the world around her has become more to her liking – and then Johar kills the conceit by colour-coding the rest of the segments of the song in red and green and so on.

That overkill may be the undoing of Karan Johar, and I really wish he’d stop self-referencing. (K3G’s Bole choodiyan is played by a brass band for a wedding baraat, and a hospital sequence is straight out of Kal Ho Naa Ho, right down to the various visitors dropping in one by one to have farewell conversations with the patient.) But you can’t deny that he’s one of the very few young directors who’s interested in – and who knows his way around – old-fashioned, Bollywood storytelling, where the emphasis is on emotion rather than reason, where the point of a scene isn’t in drawing out truth or detailing reality but in the sensual experience of the moment: foreplay, climax, afterplay (or, if you will, buildup, detonation, cool-down). He knows that he has a dark story to tell, so he loads his first half with corny comedy, making us like his characters before we have reason to dislike them. He values the power of precisely-shaped words conveying the beating heart of an emotion with sledgehammer impact. He realises that part of the reason we’re here is to see five-star stars getting the five-star treatment, so there’s not a scene, not a shot that shows his actors as anyone remotely resembling us. Yet, the way Johar tells his story isn’t old-fashioned at all; he uses spruced-up movie trickery as well as anyone else. When Rishi calls Maya to apologise for yelling at her, she’s on the phone with her lover Dev, so Rishi leaves a voice message; Johar uses a split screen to simultaneously show both of them making their respective calls, and we simultaneously see one who’s in the process of mending this marriage, the other in the process of breaking it. Who’d have guessed that our prime purveyor of candy-coloured entertainment had it in him to process these shades of grey!

Film Reviews and Humour13 Aug 2006 08:06 pm

[Semantics adjusted to blog language]

A1 and B1 are married and so are A2 and B2. A1 sleeps with B2 and they tell A2 and B1. The marriages are over. A1 and B2 marry.

Direction
Karan Johar trying to make a ‘Silsila’. He is no Yash Chopra. He better stick to his stupid movie making style and leave the substance stream alone.

Music
‘Mitwa’ and the title song apart, Shankar-Ehsaan-Loy fail to impress. Background music restricted to stretching sitar strings and crying violins.

Editing
Movie length 3 hours 20 mins!

Acting
Big B is the best

Rating
*

Legend:
*Stay at home
**If you have the time to kill, go ahead, but not recommended
***Watch if you are a film buff!
****Go watch it on the big screen!
*****Don’t miss watching this one on the big screen! Avoid piracy!

Film Reviews04 Aug 2006 03:03 pm
“Yun Hota to Kya Hota” is the directorial debut of the legendary actor Naseeruddin Shah. I don’t know if it’s out of respect for this person or if it’s the effect of the script, but the cast that he has managed for this movie is in itself something that’s not been seen before! 

Paresh Rawal, Bomman Irani (wasted in a miniscule role), Irfan Khan, Jimmy Shergill, Konkona Sen Sharma, Ayesha Thakia, Ratna Pathak Shah & Suhasini Mulay. Each one is a rare talent in the field of Indian cinema. To have agreed to play a role that is 1/8th of the movie is in itself an achievement. The performances were outstanding to say the least.

YHTKH is a story revolving around four love stories that take birth in India and end in the US.

Konkona & Jimmy are a newly married couple where Jimmy has to leave for the US on the day next to his marriage reception.

Irfan Khan is in love with this Ballet Dancer(Suhasini Mulay) and he has to go to the US to take refuge from a murder (of Bomman Irani) in which he is falsely implicated.

Paresh Rawal meets his ex-flame (Ratna Pathak Shah) who is presently married to a drunkard and agrees to arranging to take her daughter to the US.

There’s this lower-middle-class, brilliant guy who has finished his studies but for some strange reason refuses to go to the US. His close friends like Ayesha Thakia and others (including a brilliant performance from a Mirinda-hairstyled guy) somehow want to send him to the US.

How does all this end? How do the love stories culminate? Watch YHTKH to find out! 

The direction may not be exemplary. But it’s definitely not bad either. There are many instances where he has indirectly referred to the final plot. And it’s the climax that takes you completely off-guard! I liked the way the characters take up different spots in the climax. Though the execution could have been better, what is delivered is good. Mr. Naseeruddin Shah, you have the skills, only thing is that you need to hone them as you have done with your acting!

Screenplay is what holds the film together. Introduction of the characters is a good idea. And from then on the film carries on in the same mode. Never is there any confusion or lack of clarity regarding the storyline. In my opinion, the screenplay is very simple. For a story of this kind, the screenplay could have been much much better. There was enough scope for innovation, but unfortunately it’s not made use of. The style is very traditional, could have been a bit more adventurous.

Editing also like the screenplay is quite safe. No risks taken. Simple delivery. Hence you can’t fault anything out here. The camerawork was good & innovative at certain points. But beyond that again, standard shots. Nothing much for any new cinematography artiste to learn. Music doesn’t quite make you stand up and dance. The background music is also good.

Overall, a movie you wouldn’t want to miss if you are a hindi movie buff. For other’s it isn’t a must see. The film will fail in the B and C centers. But might rake in considerable moolah in the multiplex market. The window to make money exists till Karan Johar’s “Kabhi Alvida Na Kehna” hits the theatres on August 11th. After that it’s going to be KANK everywhere!

My rating: ***

Legend:
*Stay at home
**If you have the time to kill, go ahead, but not recommended
***Watch if you are a film buff!
****Go watch it on the big screen!
*****Don’t miss watching this one on the big screen! Avoid piracy!

Film Reviews30 May 2006 02:41 pm

“Fanaa” is Kunal Kohli’s third directorial venture. His first one “Mujhse Dosti Karoge” was a flop. If I was his producer I would have dropped him. But Aditya Chopra ka kya jaata hai.. uske baap ka paisa hai! So, second one “Hum Tum” was made. Critically acclaimed and well-handled. It had good performances from Saif and Rani. Aditya’s baap’s paisa came back and Aditya decided to bet it again on Kunal Kohli. Beats me!

It also beats me why Kunal chose to drop Rani in “Fanaa” after having her in his first two films. Rani played a similar but more challenging role in “Black”. Aamir Khan and Rani make a very good pair. So, why was Rani dropped?

With Kajol, Aamir, Kunal, Aditya Chopra, Yash Chopra, Ravi. K. Chandran and Jatin-Lalit (after a long time, but also their last foray together) expectations are sky high. After good publicity through the teasers and trailors, the expectations became almost un”pen”able.

Blind-girl sets out to Delhi to perform on January 26th in front of the President of India at the Red Fort. I need to make a point here about her parents. They ham crazily. Rishi Kapoor sobers down towards the second half, and thankfully Kiron Kher disappears. Anybody knows why she was killed? I will tell you. She was getting back to her “Devdas” hamming mode, so she was shunted out!

Blind-girl meets die-hard-romantic-travel-guide who speaks less in normal words but only keeps reeling out eloquent urdu sher-o-shaayari. Blind-girl falls in love with this shaayar. Shaayar also falls in love. This shaayar is her shehzaada according to her haming-mom. Shaayar doesn’t want to admit his love with Blind-girl, but ends up carrying her from a train to a hospital to cure her of her blindness. Actually they were supposed to get married and they suddenly end up in the hospital. And you are like, “Hey, who’s the editor of this movie?”

Hammers assemble in the hospital around their daughter. Shaayar is missing. Blind-girl regains her eyesight. Blind-girl is no longer blind-girl! And shaayar is no longer shaayar! He is dead and was identified by the not-blind-girl. And you are no longer able to take the crap!

But then wait there’s a twist. Shaayar is the mastermind behind the IKF (Assume whatever full-form you want). He is bigger than the CIA, KGB or the Mosad or even all of these put together. He has the ability to single-handedly destroy the entire Nation of India. A dangerous terrorist. So, blind girl is now normal-girl and shaayar is now terrorist.

Terrorist considers himself to be a soldier in the fight for the freedom of Kashmir. There is a comical “Anti-terrorist bureau” where Tabu does the role of Mrs. Tyagi and there is one other fellow who dons the role of the head of the anti-terrorist bureau. Now this fellow was the villain in “Ghulam”, and that’s my last recall of this guy. The casting director fails miserably in his job. Casting Aamir & Kajol is an easy job, but what about the rest?!

One word more about Mrs. Tyagi. From where does she arrive at those marvellous decisions? She should be at the Mind-Reading and Astrology cell instead of this place. Characterisation apart from the lead pair is not well thought out. No-one looks convincing. And what was Vrijesh Hirjee doing? Apart from Aamir and Kajol, there is no attention paid to anyone else.

Just like the movie, my review also seems to digress at the smallest available opportunity. Let me continue with the story.

The dangerous terrorist now carries on with his mission while the then-blind-now-normal-girl thinks her shaayar is dead and continues her life. What happens in the end? An end, which never comes. You keep waiting for it, but then you come across songs, antaksharis-with-strangers, and many other digressive measures taken to just stretch the climax. I was not very happy waiting for the end to come. But once it ended, I was very happy! Happy that the movie ended.

Kajol, before the rise of Rani, was considered the best of the present lot of actresses. But now, it’s tough to choose between Rani and Kajol. Especially after “Black”. Kajol comes back with a super performance. If she continues being choosy and picks the best scripts, which she is in a position to do, she is bound to get back to where she belongs. The number one actress in India.

Aamir Khan seems to essay any role he wants whenever he wants. Coming back after a powerful role in “Rang De Basanti”, Aamir demonstrates again why he is the country’s top actor. Take a bow Aamir.

Jatin-Lalit might as well split and take rest or take rest even together. Except for “Chaand Sifaarish” nothing else seemed to work! Salim-Sulaiman are turning out to carve their own niche in the world of background music. The “Subaanallah” piece is particularly haunting!

Ravi. K. Chandran makes the movie look slick and extremely good. His close-up shots of Aamir and Kajol are amazing. And the camerawork during the title credits is eye-catching. The helicopter shots and the sweeping shots over the snow-ranges are all works of art.

Kunal Kohli must learn how to hire an editor and work towards a better and tighter screenplay idea. I will not say that the direction was bad, but there’s nothing to write home about either. A director who needs good scripts to run the show. But then, who doesn’t? I don’t rate him highly. You can’t call a good story, bad editing, horrible screenplay and unforgivable casting as good direction.

Apart from Aamir and Kajol, there’s nothing in the movie. Story keeps you a little interested till the end. Whereas everything else tries to throw you out of the theatre.

My rating: ***

Legend:
* Stay at home
** If you have the time to kill, go ahead, but not recommended
*** Can watch on a pirated DVD!
**** Go, watch it on the big screen!
***** Don’t miss watching this one on the big screen! Avoid piracy!

Film Reviews20 May 2006 12:43 pm

Review has been written by a friend of mine – Mr. Damodharan. A senior of mine from B-School. He can be contacted at damodharanu@yahoo.com

Every time the world gets bored of pop corn flicks like War of the worlds, Minority Report, Artificial Intelligence Steven Spielberg comes up with his trademark flick that leaves his imprint strongly. Be it Saving Private Ryan or Jurassic Park or Schindler’s List.

This time it is ‘Munich’. I would say its one of the toughest in the director’s career and perhaps the most anguished. One of those Hollywood fictions that seems to stupefy those who miss the nuance in the words “inspired by real events.”

Based on the controversial book ‘Vengeance’ by George Jonas, the movie is based on the real life incident of the aftermath of murder of eleven Israeli athletes by a Palestinian terrorist group ‘Black September’ at the Munich Olympics. It portrays both sides without leaning to either of them.

The movie kick starts with a scene where Palestinians enter the dormitory of the athletes in the Olympiad at Munich. They take both the Israeli athletes and the coaches as hostages. A catastrophic showdown emerges shortly after that in which all the Israelis get killed. The movie then traverses back to the house of the Israeli Prime minister Golda Meir where ‘Avner’ a former Mossad agent who is coerced to take up the task of tracking and hunting the men behind the terrorist attacks are present along with others. The task will mean that Avner will have assistance in terms of man power and money but if being caught, Israel would deny their very existence itself.

Avner leaves Jerusalem and his wife and travels to Europe. There, he meets his team members, Steve (Daniel Craig), Carl (Ciaran Hinds), Hans (Hanns Zischler) and Robert (Mathieu Kassovitz). A team comprising a bomb expert, work the books, a man good with guns, and a cleaner to wipe the loose ends as the team progresses in executing the task. They find out that ‘Black September’, a group of Eleven people has planned the attack. All eleven of them are in Europe and hence Avner & his team has to stay as long as it takes in Europe and kill all of them. Avner has no idea where to start. He goes to Frankfurt to meet an old friend ‘Louis‘ who knows someone who knows someone etc which leads to the first amongst the eleven getting killed. Avner gets going with Louis, (Mathieu Amalric). Louis is expensive though consistent and provides the information for Avner’s hit squad. Avner’s team starts leaving a trail of corpses In the end his team accomplish the task clinically though they are also targeted by the PLOs. Only Avner survives till the end.

The movie then revolves around Avner’s character – the emotions, the paranoia, the emotional stress he undergoes during the executions. He along with his team really face conflict within themselves as the executions kill bystanders and innocent people who just come their way. The movie has lot of dialogues difficult to pay attention to though they are powerful. Spielberg brings out the ‘Israel-Palestine’ issue like ‘opening a bottle of colored liquid and spills in on the floor’. Leaves it there. A different touch Spielberg has given to the movie. He does not attempt to give any solution instead throws light on the issue from different angles trying to making the issue clearer”

Avner leaves Jerusalem and his wife and travels to Europe. There, he meets his team members, Steve (Daniel Craig), Carl (Ciaran Hinds), Hans (Hanns Zischler) and Robert (Mathieu Kassovitz). A team comprising a bomb expert, work the books, a man good with guns,
and a cleaner to wipe the loose ends as the team progresses in executing the task. They find out that ‘Black September’, a group of Eleven people has planned the attack. All eleven of them are in Europe and hence Avner & his team has to stay as long as it takes in Europe and kill all of them. Avner has no idea where to start. He goes to Frankfurt to meet an old friend ‘Louis’ who knows someone who knows someone etc which leads to the first amongst the eleven getting killed. Avner gets going with Louis, (Mathieu Amalric). Louis is expensive though consistent and provides the information for Avner’s hit squad. Avner’s team starts leaving a trail of corpses In the end his team accomplish the task clinically though they are also targeted by the PLOs. Only Avner survives till the end.

The movie then revolves around Avner’s character – the emotions, the paranoia, the emotional stress he undergoes during the executions. He along with his team really face conflict within themselves as the executions kill bystanders and innocent people who just come their way.
The movie has lot of dialogues difficult to pay attention to though they are powerful. Spielberg brings out the ‘Israel-Palestine’ issue like ‘opening a bottle of colored liquid and spills in on the floor’. Leaves it there. A different touch Spielberg has given to the movie. He does not attempt to give any solution instead throws light on the issue from different angles trying to making the issue clearer.

In one of his interviews, I remember Steven Spielberg mention “I guess as I grow older, I just feel more responsibility for telling the stories that have some kind of larger meaning…as I get older, I feel the burden of responsibility that comes along with such a powerful tool. I certainly have made movies by popular demand. There is a distinction between moviemaking and filmmaking. I want to do both.” I believe, though direction is tight, the movie is a bit slow. The intelligent audience would have to decide whether the responses from Israelis are ‘counter-terrorism’ or ‘retaliation’. Spielberg also hammers down an emotional punch down our throat by making Guri Weinberg act in the movie. Guri Weinberg plays Moshe Weinberg the Israeli wrestling referrer and former wrestling champion who died in the massacre. Spielberg is too unwilling and seldom cringes to exercise his ideological sureties in his movies

Steven Spielberg has a team of the best in the world. 73 year old Michael Kahn as editor, 50 year old Janus Kamunski, 70 year old John Williams. They almost produce ‘perfections’ every time. In the next generations to come, people who get trained in film production institutes should have syllabus covering works from this team. To begin with, ‘Direction’. The movie is too powerful with Spielberg trying to balance between tragedy and revenge, ethics and politics, diplomacy and emotion.

Camerawork is geometric. Be it the verdant France or the bleached outskirts of Israel. Its presented beautifully. Scenes where the hand held cameras are used to capture the events to make it more realistic are breathtaking. Looks so simple yet gargantuan. The killings are carried out in various European capitals -Rome, Paris, Cyprus, Beirut and Athens. The camera takes the users back to the European capitals of the 1970s. In the climax where a discussion happens between two guys, the camera is pulled back and in the back ground we see the twin towers in the backdrop. Sometimes such elegant shots also show the truthfulness behind the theme the movie carries.

Editing is strong. To say it is strong it was felt. It would be beyond considerable sense to comment on Michael Kahn’s editing.

Munich is his best I would say until his next movie comes.

Screenplay is by Tony Kushner (Angels in America) and Eric Roth (Forrest Gump). Tough job though the length of the movie is really a backdraw. To maintain the importance of the theme, the screenplay looks stretched a little too far.

‘Music’. John Williams should remember 2005 for a long time. He had 4 releases – ‘War of the worlds’, ‘Star Wars – Revenge of the Sith’, ‘Memoirs of a Geisha’ and ‘Munich’. Munich would be remembered for its uniqueness. ‘A Prayer for peace’ would not only stand to embrace the history of the tragedy that happened in 1972 but would stand to honour the mourning for the members of the Israeli team. The piano piece during the end credits will be one of this bests.

Screenplay is by Tony Kushner (Angels in America) and Eric Roth (Forrest Gump). Tough job though the length of the movie is really a backdraw. To maintain the importance of the theme, the screenplay looks stretched a little too far.

However being a Steven Spielberg fan I feel that he can make an epic in no time with his resources. It appears to me that the movie had to be rushed to get it released before Oscars. Well people make mistakes. Even extraordinary people. Even Spielberg. Spielberg does one with the length of the movie.

Though Munich is not the best of the movies ever made. It may not be the best of the ‘boringly reliable’ Steven Spielberg. Yet it would be a significant movie in the list of movies every made. Quite unparralleled. Just because of the theme of the movie and how it thrives to stick to it.

Film Reviews and Film related19 Oct 2005 12:30 pm

The movie is a waste of time. Don’t ask me why I watched it.

Srikanth, who has only one decent movie in his track record continues with being a one-movie wonder. He has good looks and so girls drool over him. That ensures the opening for the first half of the first show of every movie of his.

Sonia Agarwal, well, she is there. So what? Should I write about her?

A host of irritating side actors, all trying to look like this malayali+tamil cross breds cracking hackneyed jokes.

The director, well again, I was told was very good in his previous movies. I can promise you, if you watch this movie, you will not believe what I heard about him before. Right now, thankfully enough, I don’t remember whatever I was told.

From somewhere, they have been able to convince Maestro Ilayaraja to score music. And as always the Maestro doesn’t dissappoint. There are a few memorable numbers, but the movie put me off so much, I don’t even remember the songs! :))

Forget about the other aspects of this movie. There are none actually. Someone who had lot of money wanted to do something about it other than burning it on Anna Salai, so he thought he will make this movie.

Extremely dumb people like me venture out to see such dumbest movies. Please read this review and consider two things:

  1. Don’t brand me as a fool for watching this movie. A request.
  2. For heaven’s sake don’t go to the theater that’s playing this movie for watching this movie. Understand?! ;)

Good you understood! :) I didn’t when my friends gave me the same advice.

Film Reviews19 Oct 2005 11:00 am

Khushi, Vaali, New and Now “Ah.. Aah..!!”. S. J. Suryah thought he has graduated from being an excellent director to being a director-cum-actor. But can somebody tell him that “New” ran primarily because it was Simran’s last movie. No, not that he was bad or anything just that we are better off with him wielding the microphone than being on-screen. I have my grouses against SJS. He doesn’t look good. He overacts. He is loud. And above all, his body language is repulsive!

Getting back to the movie review…

The story revolves around the hero and heroine living in together. Like all SJS movies, the theme will come as a ethical, moral, cultural, etc shock to most of the audience. It starts of well, with issues like trust, understanding etc. being highlighted very well. Slowly gets into SJS’s favourite pitfall – Lust. The hero and the heroine get separated at the interval because of some misunderstanding and stupidity mainly on part of the hero. How they kiss and make up with the usual melodrama but with an unusually interesting theme makes the rest of the story.

SJS does a good job of direction. Though it can be called overdoing, the style with which he started the movie and flowed into the high-energy title song was a very confident way of doing it. The confidence shows in the delicate handling of physical attraction and emotional attraction. He has separated the issues and given it a very good treatment. He has clearly grown as a director over the years. Shows lot of promise. Unless he casts himself and puts me off, I am going to watch his movies.

Nila, a Simran [SJS's crush! ;)] look-alike, could have been much better. She could have atleast lip-synced those tamil words properly. It looked like her lips were stitched together! Even Trisha seems to do this. And so does Ilayathalapathi Vijay. Why can’t they talk freely on-screen? Nila can get better. But I don’t think like other SJS’s discoveries she is going to reach the top.

A R Rahman is the superstar of this movie. “Mayiliragae”, “Woodpecker”, “thigu, thigu”, “Varu girai” and the title song [of course!] are each gems in their own right. These songs, like all Rahman compositions, took time to grow on me. This man A R Rahman exceeds expectations like no-one can. Special mention I must make of Naresh Iyer and Hariharan for carrying off these intricate songs so easily. Sadhana Sargam, a Rahman regular, is brilliant as usual. And Rahman backs himself for the extremely peppy title song. After “Fanaah” in Yuva and “Azaadi” in Bose – The Forgotten Hero, this is Rahman’s next rendition. The energy he infuses into the song is infectious. Also, Rahman’s BGM is worth a mention. This man has grown amazingly well. He was not the best BGM composer we knew till sometime back. And today, he is composing musicals and conducting symphonies. All this shows in the BGM! Long live ARR!

The cinematography was good. With the blue tinge coming out well at the appropriate places. The camera angles, though unconventional, did match with the mood of the movie and in some places actually helped creating it. The scene where SJS and his friend are havinga drink & talking about illusion. Suddenly Nila appears behind SJS. The camera shows her upside down and that’s how confused SJS was! The editing could have been crisper. Dialogues could have been toned down, but that’s SJS’s style. Can’t do much about that. Costumes were funny at times. And in any case, SJS doesn’t look good to me in anything.

The movie is worth a “dekko” if you can stand SJS on screen. You shouldn’t be the hypocritic type who says where are live-in relationships in India and all that. Just get to Pune or Bangalore and you might actually enter into one! ;) That’s how rampant it’s becoming! The music could be a good crowd-puller but finally it’s the parts in between that you have paid money to watch. So take your call. I find this movie a better watch than the pretentious Ghajini.

« Previous PageNext Page »