<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mysorean &#187; Spirituality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mysorean.com/category/spirituality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysorean.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:26:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Perennial dilemma of a seeker&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.mysorean.com/2010/03/02/perennial-dilemma-of-a-seeker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mysorean.com/2010/03/02/perennial-dilemma-of-a-seeker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 09:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mysorean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serious thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spirituality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysorean.com/?p=551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes when I give too much importance to my emotions then I see the quality of my life deteriorating. Activity of the mind becomes uncontrollable. Closing eyes seems to take you to the heart of the matter but only to increase the activity further. How do we break free from our tendency to identify ourselves [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes when I give too much importance to my emotions then I see the quality of my life deteriorating. Activity of the mind becomes uncontrollable. Closing eyes seems to take you to the heart of the matter but only to increase the activity further. How do we break free from our tendency to identify ourselves with thing that we clearly know we aren&#8217;t?<br />
<span id="more-551"></span><br />
It is equally strange to identify oneself as one&#8217;s phone or computer as it is with our emotions. Emotions are accumulated the same way the phone or computer was. Why can&#8217;t I use emotion to convey or receive a point like a phone and switch it off for the rest of the while? What is it with this stupid compulsion to continuously generate and get involved and attached to these emotions?  </p>
<p>Why is it that I want everything else and everybody else around me to be in a certain way to enable me to be in a certain way? Why can&#8217;t I remain the way I want to? Which is a bigger tragedy &#8211; others not being my way? Or I not being my way? Cleary the latter is a far more significant problem than the former. </p>
<p>The whole point with &#8220;I&#8221; is that it is already the way it has to be. My perception is so clouded with these damn thoughts about work, home, family, properties that I acquired so on and so forth that I am unable to clear my sense of perception. These thoughts transform themselves into such strong emotions that after a while there is no perception &#8211; only emotions and thoughts. And that brings me back to my original question &#8211; why emotions? </p>
<p>What does emotion need to exist? Obviously something is driving its existence and pushing it into the realm of the mind. What is that something? When Ï&#8221; am a complete being being by myself whatis the need for a horrible crutch like emotion? Ok &#8211; I don&#8217;t know by experience that I am a complete being but yes without it being complete it couldn&#8217;t be the source of creation. When will I destroy myself to let this source of creation take form and express itself? For that to happen I need to break all that I identify myself with. Including these compulsive emotions. How well they disguise themselves to confuse me about myself?! It is amazing that the amount of distance they build within me between Ï&#8221;and my desire to experience Ï&#8221; seems to be infinite but also a matter of a moment of deep realization. THis crippling duality and the absolute stillness &#8211; when will I make the journey? Have I started? Or am I just standing on the shores waiting for the river to invite me? Unless I let go of the bank I won&#8217;t experience the river, but if I knew how to jump into the river &#8211; the question remains whether I would have chosen to do so? </p>
<p>The question arises mainly because even after having tasted the Divine I am unable to break away from my compulsions and shortcomings. I continue to live with them and do not seem to have escaped from them.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mysorean.com/2010/03/02/perennial-dilemma-of-a-seeker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transform The World, Start From Within</title>
		<link>http://www.mysorean.com/2009/08/23/transform-the-world-start-from-within/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mysorean.com/2009/08/23/transform-the-world-start-from-within/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mysorean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spirituality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysorean.com/?p=530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In every human being, there is an aspiration to become better, more loving and more concerned about one another and the planet. But people are trying to work towards it from the wrong end. People are trying to be loving, they are trying to be good. When you look at yourself, if you are happy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In every human being, there is an aspiration to become better, more loving and more concerned about one another and the planet. But people are trying to work towards it from the wrong end. People are trying to be loving, they are trying to be good. When you look at yourself, if you are happy and joyful, naturally you are a very loving, generous, wonderful human being. This is true for everybody. On the other hand, when you are in a state of unhappiness, frustration or any other sense of unpleasantness within yourself, you may be nasty. There is no point trying to be loving, trying to be pleasant to somebody else.<br />
<span id="more-530"></span><br />
When you are feeling pleasant, you are naturally pleasant to everyone around you. The fundamental thing that human beings have to work towards is to make them-selves truly joyful and blissful. Trying to produce good human beings has never really worked. When people are joyful, they are all wonderful human beings. Joy is the best insurance against all evil. People will always find ways to subvert values, morality and ethics. But when you are very joyful, when you are very pleasant within yourself, you are naturally nice to everyone around you. So, my whole work is to make human beings truly blissful.</p>
<p>Spirituality does not mean going away from life. Spirituality means becoming alive in the fullest possible way so you are not just alive on the surface, you are alive to the core. If you look at how full of life and joyful you were when you were five years of age and how alive and joyful you are today, has the level gone up or gone down?</p>
<p>For most people, it has gone down. It need not be so. With age, physical agility may go down but the level of joy and sense of being alive need not go down. If your level of joy and aliveness is going down, it is as if you are committing suicide in installments. This happens because you only focus on certain aspects of life, but without including every aspect, you cannot live a full life.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, most of the time, belief systems are passing off as spirituality. The moment you believe something, if you believe &#8220;this is it&#8221;, you are bringing a certain degree of rigidity into the very life process that you are.</p>
<p>This is not spirituality.</p>
<p>The spiritual process is always a quest, a seeking; that is why when you say, &#8220;I&#8217;m on a spiritual path,&#8221; you say &#8220;I&#8217;m a seeker.&#8221; When you say &#8220;I&#8217;m religious,&#8221; you say &#8220;I&#8217;m a believer.&#8221; There is a significant difference, because believing means you have assumed something that you do not know; seeking means you have realised that you do not know, which brings an enormous amount of flexibility. Whenever you say, &#8220;I do not know something,&#8221; you are flexible. Whenever you think, &#8220;I know it,&#8221; you become rigid. This rigidity is not just in attitude; it percolates into every aspect of your life. This rigidity is also the cause of an enormous amount of suffering in the world.</p>
<p>How human beings are, that is how the society will be. So, creating human beings who are flexible and willing to look at everything rather than being stuck in their ideas and opinions definitely makes for a different kind of society. And the very energy that such human beings carry will influence everything around them.</p>
<p><em>This is a speech by <a href="http://www.ishafoundation.org/Sadhguru">Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev</a>. It was emailed to me by Kirthana. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mysorean.com/2009/08/23/transform-the-world-start-from-within/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A namaskaram can take you beyond</title>
		<link>http://www.mysorean.com/2009/03/21/a-namaskaram-can-take-you-beyond/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mysorean.com/2009/03/21/a-namaskaram-can-take-you-beyond/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 11:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mysorean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spirituality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[determinism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free will]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fund-raising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Isha Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mahashivarathri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[namaskaram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volunteering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysorean.com/?p=517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday my colleague and I had a longish discussion on &#8216;free will&#8217; and &#8216;determinism&#8217; (Ok ok, don&#8217;t close the window, they are in fact the world&#8217;s way of communicating simple things. Look at these links [1] and [2]. Don&#8217;t read in detail &#8211; just the first couple of lines will give you an idea of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday my colleague and I had a longish discussion on &#8216;free will&#8217; and &#8216;determinism&#8217; (Ok ok, don&#8217;t close the window, they are in fact the world&#8217;s way of communicating simple things. Look at these links [<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_will">1</a>] and [<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determinism">2</a>]. Don&#8217;t read in detail &#8211; just the first couple of lines will give you an idea of what they mean) and his conclusion was that &#8216;<em>Illusion</em> of free will is necessary for society to carry on&#8217;. Okay so at a fundamental level I don&#8217;t believe in either of them. And no this is not going to be a long post about my philosophy and all that. Just a word on how my experience transcended both the above-mentioned <em>concepts</em>!<br />
<span id="more-517"></span><br />
I was involved in a very minimal way in fund-raising and volunteering for <a href="http://www.ishafoundation.org">Isha Foundation</a> during the <a href="http://www.ishafoundation.org/Isha-Celebrations/Mahashivarathri.isa">Mahashivarathri</a> celebrations on Feb 23rd. I asked my colleagues and few of my relatives and friends for money for getting the fund-raising in place and it was done. The real thing happened when I was volunteering. I was in the reception committee whose primary objective was to &#8216;welcome guests&#8217;. I was asked to stand near the gate and welcome people with a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namaste">namaskaram</a> (folded hands gesture). Thoughts ranged from &#8220;Oh no, I can&#8217;t do this&#8221;, &#8220;I have never done this even in functions of my own family where the invitees were my own people and here it is all public anyone can walk in&#8221;, &#8220;How can I? I mean I am so shy and all that&#8221; to &#8220;Can I run away from here?&#8221;, &#8220;Why did I even volunteer here?&#8221; so on and so forth.</p>
<p>But then I had given my word. I went there &#8211; near the gate. Stood for a second and just started with my mind kind of stunned into silence I guess. It went blank. I started lifting my hands and putting them together with a smile to welcome whoever walked into the gate. Everytime someone walked in &#8211; I would do it. It was a ritual and I did it. Some people responded. Some didn&#8217;t. Initially my namaskarams depended on the response. If they smiled back then I would hold on a little longer otherwise it would drop off.  </p>
<p>Then something incredible happened. I decided to welcome whoever came in with the same complete (as complete as I could do) namaskaram irrespective of their response or who they were &#8211; children, adults, etc. I was trying to create a condition inside myself that &#8216;whatever happens to you (the visitor) inside here will be good&#8217;. As I started doing this, my hand ache, my elbow ache, the pain in my legs, everything went out of my mind. I was offering myself completely to each person who was walking in with 100% sincerity and a blessing of &#8216;good will happen to you here today&#8217;. The smile came on automatically, I didn&#8217;t have to put it on. It turned into one of the most enjoyable experiences. Imagine getting the opportunity to welcome 10,000 people with a blessing. Won&#8217;t you smile on your own? Oh sure, anyone will. I guarantee you. </p>
<p>Now comes the even better part. As this enjoyment increased, I could sense growing excitement inside me. I would start looking outside the gate waiting for people to come. As soon as I spotted a visitor, I would bow down to them. Looking at me everyone responded. Even no-response meant that it was a response because they weren&#8217;t used to a person bowing down to them. And I used to get excited seeing people entering the venue with a feeling of &#8216;Ok. I have come to a <em>good</em> place where something <em>good</em> will happen to me&#8217;. I began seeing at as an opportunity to break some constraint inside them, unblocking some block inside their minds to let them be free and take in whatever is being offered by <a href="http://www.ishafoundation.org/Sadhguru">Sadhguru</a> completely. </p>
<p>The namaskarams just got more intense as I kept creating more intense conditions inside me. Then came the point where something inside me broke and took me to a totally different plane. I saw no difference between me and the person coming in. It was the most intense experience of my life. The namaskarams were not being done anymore, they were happening as an expression of joy. Tears started flowing out of my eyes. But I was smiling. I could see people coming in were also moved. Of course, a few of them got scared too. But this didn&#8217;t carry on for a great while. This must have happened for a few moments. And that was it. That&#8217;s when I understood that <strong><em>anything</em></strong> that we do can take us beyond our current state of experience of the body and the mind. It depends on how willing we are to break whatever we have created inside ourselves &#8211; free will, determinism, whatever &#8211; and concentrate and give ourselves totally to what we are doing.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mysorean.com/2009/03/21/a-namaskaram-can-take-you-beyond/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Science meets spirituality</title>
		<link>http://www.mysorean.com/2009/02/19/science-meets-spirituality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mysorean.com/2009/02/19/science-meets-spirituality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mysorean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spirituality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysorean.com/?p=509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To get to what is beyond our comprehension is not impossible. The technology is available. It&#8217;s our perception that needs to go beyond. &#8220;What is Real?&#8221;, as Morpheus asks in Matrix. See this video to get a clearer understanding of what spiritual leaders have been saying all through the existence of civilization:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To get to what is beyond our comprehension is not impossible. The technology is available. It&#8217;s our perception that needs to go beyond. &#8220;What is Real?&#8221;, as Morpheus asks in Matrix. See this video to get a clearer understanding of what spiritual leaders have been saying all through the existence of civilization:<br />
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/qzJRiW4yzkw&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/qzJRiW4yzkw&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mysorean.com/2009/02/19/science-meets-spirituality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My second tryst with yoga</title>
		<link>http://www.mysorean.com/2008/06/12/my-second-tryst-with-yoga/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mysorean.com/2008/06/12/my-second-tryst-with-yoga/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mysorean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hinduism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spirituality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yoga]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysorean.com/2008/06/12/my-second-tryst-with-yoga/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was a yoga course that I did in September 2005. Today I attended the first class of another programme by the same foundation. It is a good foundation to be involved with an enlightened guru leading the way &#8211; Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev. I had a couple of posts [1,2] on Sadhguru in the past. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a yoga <a href="http://www.mysorean.com/2005/09/05/yoga/">course</a> that I did in September 2005. Today I attended the first class of another <a href="http://www.ishafoundation.org/eflyers/AnandhaAlai_2008.html">programme</a> by the same <a href="http://www.ishafoundation.org">foundation</a>. It is a good foundation to be involved with an enlightened guru leading the way &#8211; Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev. I had a couple of posts [<a href="http://www.mysorean.com/2005/09/09/sadhguru-jaggi-vasudev-speaks/">1</a>,<a href="http://www.mysorean.com/2005/09/26/rising-above-self-using-technology-for-common-good/">2</a>] on Sadhguru in the past. Yet to have the privilege of meeting him face to face. His CDs and DVDs are a very influential source by itself. I can imagine meeting him must be quite an experience of energy.<br />
<span id="more-489"></span><br />
This time my pursuit of yoga was more from a purely personal development point of view. My first tryst was more from an explorational point of view &#8211; I mean I did not really have any objective at that time apart from just seeing how Yoga could help in my life. Right now, as they say, life has taught me enough lessons that I now need Yoga to sail through this smoothly. Or else I can clearly see myself drowning in a clutch of self-imposed situations. Obviously none of us wants this to happen ourselves, right? I have a wife and son with me. I ain&#8217;t alone anymore and the responsibility that it brings with it is enormous. I don&#8217;t need to overemphasise this to any of you who are married already and for those having a kid &#8211; you are probably already reading the next sentence.</p>
<p>Yoga is expected to take you beyond the usual experience of yourself which is limited to body and mind. And Isha Yoga has a good track record of doing that. During my earlier course with them they had transformed me into something else. Rather that sentence should be rephrased to this: during my earlier course they helped me find my true self. I had realised that all the while I was trying to be someone else and never my true self. And true states are always ecstatic states to be in. That&#8217;s why we find sadhus and munis to be in an eternal state of happiness &#8211; they have found their true state and are on a journey to explore further. I don&#8217;t expect to find anything different in this course either. Plain simple myself. And I am confident that &#8216;I&#8217; am capable enough to handle whatever life throws at me henceforth. The only thing I wish not to repeat this time is: to disconnect from the practices being taught in class. I want to hold on to them and do them for the rest of my life.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mysorean.com/2008/06/12/my-second-tryst-with-yoga/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Co-existence of science and God</title>
		<link>http://www.mysorean.com/2006/08/16/co-existence-of-science-and-god/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mysorean.com/2006/08/16/co-existence-of-science-and-god/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mysorean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hinduism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spirituality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysorean.com/2006/08/16/co-existence-of-science-and-god/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An interesting article that discusses the co-existence of science and God in today&#8217;s world. Is God Necessary? C.S.RAMAKRISHNAN Sri C.S. Ramakrishnan is a long-standing and close devotee and a former editor of The Vedanta Kesari. Voltaire, whose massive scholarship and keen intellect are beyond question, used to say that if God did not exist it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="left">An interesting article that discusses the co-existence of science and God in today&#8217;s world. <strong><em /></strong></div>
<div align="center"><strong><em /></strong></div>
<div align="left"><strong><em><a href="http://www.sriramakrishnamath.org/magazine/vk/2006/07-3-5.asp">Is God Necessary?<br />
</a></em></strong>C.S.RAMAKRISHNAN</div>
<div align="justify"><em>Sri C.S. Ramakrishnan is a long-standing and close devotee and a former editor of <a href="http://www.sriramakrishnamath.org/Magazine/VK/VKhome.asp">The Vedanta Kesari</a>. </em></div>
<div align="justify" />
<div align="justify">Voltaire, whose massive scholarship and keen intellect are beyond question, used to say that if God did not exist it will be necessary to invent him. He felt that many things in life and the world cannot be rationally and consistently explained without assuming the presence of God. No doubt, at the time of Voltaire science had not developed as it has subsequently. Today&#8217;s science is an Aladdin&#8217;s lamp enables us to perform phenomena, which would have been termed miracles. All manner of indescribable phenomena can be attributed to modern science. So most scientists do not share Voltaire&#8217;s views.</div>
<div align="justify">It will be interesting to see what a reputed scientist like Eric Cornell, the Nobel laureate in Physics in the year 2001, has to say in this regard. He gave a very insightful lecture while getting inducted into the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Eric Cornell explained his view by accounting for a familiar pheno menon, the blue sky. He offers two types of solution. The first answer of scientific insight is the Raleigh&#8217;s law of scattering of light. Light consists of a series of coloured rays starting from red and ending in blue. The rays in the red region are long waves whereas those in the blue region are short. When the light is flowing from the sun to the earth, the rays undergo scattering. The red rays get scattered more readily than the blue ones. Therefore by the time the rays reach the earth only blue rays are left, i.e. the source appears to be blue. The sky therefore is blue. This was the discovery made by Lord Raleigh on which subsequent developments in optics took place.</div>
<div align="justify">But Cornell indicates a second solution. May be God wanted the sky to be blue. You cannot question why he wanted like that. The Nobel laureate points out that Raleigh&#8217;s law of scattering explains `how&#8217; blueness came but not why. Science always explains the `how&#8217; of things and not the `why&#8217; of things. While how is scientifically explained, the why finds explanation only in religion.</div>
<div align="justify">Eric Cornell suggests that in a scientific class only scientific questions can be raised. For a religious answer we have to be in a religious class. He suggests that we should not confuse by asking a scientific question in a religious class and a religious question in a scientific class. Not that the two solutions are opposed to each other but each has to be applied in a separate dimension. Suppose we are talking to a friend in English we have to follow the rules of English grammar but if the talk is in Tamil it is the Tamil grammar that has to be applied. Both the grammar rules are valid and not opposed to each other. Again, suppose you have the dream of a tiger chasing you. In the dream the chase is real. But once you wake up, the dream-tiger disappears. In the wakeful state we cannot ask where the tiger has gone, though it is the same mind which is witnessing both. The Ultimate Reality is one; it may manifest itself scientifically or religiously. In what way we wish to perceive the reality, the choice is ours.</div>
<div align="justify" />
<div align="justify"><em>Courtesy:</em> <a href="http://sriramakrishnamath.org">Website of Sri Ramakrishna Math, Chennai, India.</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mysorean.com/2006/08/16/co-existence-of-science-and-god/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ramakrishna Ashram &#124; Discourse on kathopanishads Part IV</title>
		<link>http://www.mysorean.com/2006/08/15/ramakrishna-ashram-discourse-on-kathopanishads-part-iv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mysorean.com/2006/08/15/ramakrishna-ashram-discourse-on-kathopanishads-part-iv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 02:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mysorean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discourses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hinduism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spirituality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysorean.com/2006/08/15/ramakrishna-ashram-discourse-on-kathopanishads-part-iv/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Continued from Part III Extending the from the types of &#8220;sukhas&#8221; quoted in the Gita, to the types quoted in the &#8220;Kathopanishads&#8221;. There are three types of &#8220;Ananda&#8221;s. Vishayananda: Vishaya (Poisonous things) + ananda (Happiness) = Happiness that we find in doing mundane tasks referred to as poisonous things. Bhajanananda: Bhajan (hymns sung in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mysorean.blogspot.com/2006/08/ramakrishna-ashram-discourse-on_13.html">Continued from Part III</a></p>
<p>Extending the from the types of <em>&#8220;sukhas&#8221;</em> quoted in the Gita, to the types quoted in the &#8220;Kathopanishads&#8221;. There are three types of <em>&#8220;Ananda&#8221;s. </em><br />
<em /><br />
<strong><em>Vishayananda:</em></strong> <em>Vishaya</em> (Poisonous things) + <em>ananda</em> (Happiness) = Happiness that we find in doing mundane tasks referred to as poisonous things.</p>
<p><strong><em>Bhajanananda:</em></strong> <em>Bhajan</em> (hymns sung in the praise of God) + <em>ananda</em> (Happiness) = Happiness that is derived from singing hymns in the praise of God.</p>
<p><em><strong>Brahmananda:</strong> Brahman</em> (The Lord) + <em>ananda</em> (Happiness) = A state of Happiness where one is united with one&#8217;s own Divine Self. It is in this state of <em>&#8220;Brahmanandam&#8221;</em> that Ultimate Happiness lies.</p>
<p>For a person to perceive an object there needs to be sunlight (<em>or light</em>). And there is a limitation to our sensory perceptions since there are physical limits. The limitations vary from species to species. Human eye, for example, cannot see clearly beyond a few metres whereas the eagle&#8217;s eye can see clearly upto several kilometres. The human eye can not perceive things in the dark whereas the cat/ owl can. Our eyes are not built that way. Physical dimensions of our sensory perception have limitations. And there is another added limitation without which we cannot perceive at all &#8211; <em>&#8220;The Mind&#8221;</em>. Our mind can influence our perceptions completely.</p>
<p>Coming back to the first part of the sloka that&#8217;s being understood it means that in the state where the sun does not shine and a person cannot perceive an object but preceives the &#8220;Ultimate Happiness&#8221; is this state of <em>&#8220;Brahmanandam&#8221;</em>. Where the sun, moon, stars or even flashes of lightning are not present, only those minds <em>&#8220;Antahakarana&#8221;</em>, that are free from all internal blemishes can perceive the Ultimate Happiness.</p>
<p>Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa once said, &#8220;Pure mind and pure Atman is one and the same&#8221;.<br />
He was responding to a question from a devotee who spoke thus, &#8220;How can I perceive something that&#8217;s transcedental through this mind?&#8221;.<br />
Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa replied, &#8220;This mind keeps hovering around everywhere. mind when completely still is no longer &#8216;Mind&#8217;. Our mind depends on our daily habits. The highest reality is something that has never been defined. It cannot be defined. If it can be confined to any <em>&#8216;naama-roopa&#8217; </em>[Names and forms] then it is not the highest reality.&#8221;</p>
<p>During the ritual of <em>&#8220;Mangalarthi&#8221;</em> in the Ramakrishna Ashram Temple we all sing <em>&#8220;Namo nama prabhuvakyamanaateetha&#8221;</em>.<br />
It can be broken into &#8220;Namo Nama Prabhu Vakya Mana Ateetha&#8221;.<br />
Which means &#8220;I bow to you (Namo) O Lord (Prabhu) who are beyond(Ateetha) names (Nama), sentences (vakya) and mind(Mana)&#8221;.<br />
These are the highest lines of praise that can possibly be. A Britisher on hearing these was lamenting how it took him hours to explain or make some one understand the deeper meaning of these words. Whereas in the Hindu way of life, it is a daily part of our lives. We sing them everyday. <em>&#8220;Bhaja Govindam&#8221;</em> that represents the highest truth that the Vedanta has to offer is sung with a simple arrangement of tabla and a harmonium.</p>
<p>All this means that the Hindu way of life was designed to achieve the <em>&#8220;Bhajanandam&#8221;</em> mentioned in the Kathopanishads. Through that we just had to take the next step that is towards <em>&#8220;Brahmanandam&#8221;</em>. Sometimes during the stages of <em>&#8220;Bhajanandam&#8221;</em> the highest reality dawns on us but it goes off at a tangent because our minds are not fully prepared to receive it. All other realities/ forms of light that we come across are borrowed realities/ forms of light. This consciousness that we are trying to understand is the basis of and for Life.</p>
<p>Sometimes we see a star in the night sky. We also notice that it wasn&#8217;t there yesterday. So, we give it a name and celebrate its deiscovery. But it&#8217;s also possible that the star might not exist at all in reality. The star might have been present millions of years back and it&#8217;s light might have been visible to us today. And our sensory perceptions only allow us to perceive, understand and believe it in a way that it&#8217;s present even today. Hence, senses do not give us access to the Highest Reality.</p>
<p>Everything that we see is Brahman. Why we do not see Brahman is the subject of spirituality.</p>
<p>Swami Vivekananda was once asked, &#8220;Why do you make us believe that God is not visible to everyone? Why do you hypnotize us into believing that we are all ignorant?&#8221;<br />
For which Swami Vivekananda replied, &#8220;I am in fact dehypnotizing you. I am creating an awareness in you that there is a world outside what we can perceive through our senses.&#8221;</p>
<p>Spiritual Life is to know that which is beyond ouselves and begins with reforming ourselves. Spiritual Life is about cultivating an attitude of Divinity and through that bringing a change to oneself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mysorean.com/2006/08/15/ramakrishna-ashram-discourse-on-kathopanishads-part-iv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ramakrishna Ashram &#124; Discourse on kathopanishads Part III</title>
		<link>http://www.mysorean.com/2006/08/13/ramakrishna-ashram-discourse-on-kathopanishads-part-iii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mysorean.com/2006/08/13/ramakrishna-ashram-discourse-on-kathopanishads-part-iii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 03:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mysorean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discourses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hinduism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spirituality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysorean.com/2006/08/13/ramakrishna-ashram-discourse-on-kathopanishads-part-iii/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This discourse was given on Sunday, August 13, 2006. In this article I have tried to include my learnings or my questions wherever possible. How is the highest reality to be perceived? Knowing the ultimate reality is not similar to knowing something through your senses. It is something that is much beyond. And knowing it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This discourse was given on Sunday, August 13, 2006. In this article I have tried to include my learnings or my questions wherever possible. </em></p>
<p>How is the highest reality to be perceived? Knowing the ultimate reality is not similar to knowing something through your senses. It is something that is much beyond. And knowing it will give you <em>&#8220;Paramam Sukham&#8221; </em>unlike happiness from sensory perceptions. For example: A man sees an apple tree. He is happy because he perceives apple to be a good thing. But when a man sees a posionous tree, his happiness doesn&#8217;t exist. Like this, happiness derived out of sensory perceptions are short-lived and temporary.</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Paramam Sukham&#8221;</em> is the peace that surpasses all happiness. Let us first try to understand what <em>&#8220;sukha&#8221;</em> is all about? In the Bhagavad Gita, chapter 18, Lord Krishna is discussing about the various kinds of <em>sukhas</em>.</p>
<p>The first one is of the lowest kind <em>&#8220;Tamasika</em>&#8220;. It is born of delusion, sleep, laziness and miscomprehension. People who live in unhygenic conditions and are happy about it are examples of such kind.</p>
<blockquote><p>Probably, people like me who sleep at any given chance are also of this<br />
kind!</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Let us take the example of the Lord himself, who once took the form of a pig (<em>Varaha avtaara)</em> and began deriving so much of happiness in that form that he forgot to come back to his original form. Lord Krishna had to remind him to come back to his original state.</p>
<p>The second one is of the mediocre kind <em>&#8220;Rajasika sukha</em>&#8220;. Happiness emerging out of an element of restlessness and lot of activity. Any type of <em>&#8220;sukha&#8221;</em> that is aimed to satisfying our greed, anger, vendetta or some such emotional extremity. This kind of happiness <em>&#8220;sukha&#8221;</em> is characterized by the taste of nectar at first and poison towards the end.</p>
<p>The third one and the highest kind <em>&#8220;Satwika sukha&#8221;</em>. This <em>sukha</em> is characterized by poison at first, but nectar at the end. Something that begins as a very difficult job but slowly we attain pleasure in it because of something that we discover in it that is more than the sensory pleasure. When we discover something more than the senses can sense then that kind of happiness is <em>&#8220;satwika sukha&#8221;</em>.</p>
<p>A fitting example of <em>&#8220;satwika sukha&#8221;</em> would be that of chewing the amla fruit. it gives a distinct bitter taste at first, but if you are able to bear with it then there is the <em>sukha</em> of the sweet taste that it leaves in the mouth towards the end.</p>
<p>Another example is that of a student studying for his exams. There are so many things to distract him from his studies. A film on the television or a film magazine or something that will give him immediate pleasure are all more attractive to him than studying for his exams. He doesn&#8217;t understand that if he studies well now, he will be able to derive more happiness later in his life. If he bears with the poison of hardwork now, he will be able to enjoy the nectar of the results later on.</p>
<p>A person who understands this basic premise of postponing immediate happiness is a mature person. He has understood the principle of <em>&#8220;satwika sukha&#8221;</em>. It is a thought requiring utmost maturity in a person. A person who doesn&#8217;t understand this becomes a source of unhappiness for everyone around him. A person who doesn&#8217;t understand this gets into bad habits and other escapist activities qutoing immediate pleasure. These are the people who become anti-social elements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mysorean.com/2006/08/13/ramakrishna-ashram-discourse-on-kathopanishads-part-iii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ramakrishna Ashram &#124; Discourse on kathopanishads Part II</title>
		<link>http://www.mysorean.com/2006/08/06/ramakrishna-ashram-discourse-on-kathopanishads-part-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mysorean.com/2006/08/06/ramakrishna-ashram-discourse-on-kathopanishads-part-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 03:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mysorean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discourses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hinduism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spirituality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysorean.com/2006/08/06/ramakrishna-ashram-discourse-on-kathopanishads-part-ii/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Continued from Part I Achieving Divinity is: To recognize the Eternal amidst the ephemeral And to recognize that force or power that gives the fruit of actions effortlessly alongwith grace. This power to achieve Divinity is recognized by &#8220;Dheera&#8220;. Eternal peace is for those who recognize the underlying Unity. &#8220;Dheera&#8221; is a very familiar word [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pkblogs.com/mysorean/2006/08/ramakrishna-ashram-discourse-on.html">Continued from Part I</a></p>
<p>Achieving Divinity is:</p>
<blockquote><p>To recognize the Eternal amidst the ephemeral<br />
And to recognize that force or power that gives the fruit of actions<br />
effortlessly alongwith grace.</p></blockquote>
<p>This power to achieve Divinity is recognized by &#8220;<em>Dheera</em>&#8220;. Eternal peace is for those who recognize the underlying Unity.</p>
<p>&#8220;Dheera&#8221; is a very familiar word to one who is familiar with Sanskrit Holy scriptures. &#8220;Dhee&#8221; means higher intellect.</p>
<p>Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa has an interesting similie to distinguish higher intellect from intellect. An intellect which is used for simple things like calculating profit and making money is like &#8220;thin curd&#8221;. <em>Chchaas</em> in hindi, <em>Majjige</em> in Kannada, <em>Majjiga</em> in Telugu and <em>Mor</em> in Tamil. An intellect that is focused on achieving God is like &#8220;thick curd&#8221;. <em>Dahi</em> in Hindi, <em>Mosaru</em> in Kannada, <em>Perugu</em> in Telugu and <em>Thayir</em> in Tamil.</p>
<p>&#8220;Dhee&#8221; appears in the Gayatri Mantra also. &#8220;<em>..<strong>Dhee</strong>yo yonaha prachodaya aath</em>&#8220;.</p>
<blockquote><p>Somebody once asked a learned monk, &#8220;What is the immediate benefit<br />
of living a morally upright life?&#8221;</p>
<p>The monk answered, &#8220;It sharpens and brightens the intellect. Thus making<br />
it ready to achieve Divinity&#8221;.</p></blockquote>
<p>To achieve the higher intellect we could start living a morally upright life.</p>
<p>&#8220;Dheera&#8221; is a person who has turned his attention within to make the discovery of inner Reality. &#8220;Dheera&#8221; is one who is a &#8220;viveki&#8221; (One with the power of discrimination).</p>
<p>The Mind is an interesting thing <em>if you can call it one</em>. It has the ultimate power of discrimination. But that power is dependant on the atmosphere in which the Mind is. Outside that atmosphere the mind might not be able to attain the same level or power of discrimination.</p>
<p>Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa used to give a simple example to illustrate this: A sail boat in ordinary condition can be easily directed with the help of changing the direction of sails. But when the wind is blowing heavily, it is tough to control the direction of the boat.</p>
<p>Similarly the wind of Senses hijacks the &#8220;Buddhi&#8221; to somewhere else. Senses are the means to identifying the external world. Once the senses become our Master, we become their slave. Senses are like Horses tied to a chariot controlled by a charioteer called &#8220;Buddhi&#8221;. If the horses begin driving the Chariot then the charioteer should start controlling. But usually, it doesn&#8217;t happen. The horses go where they want, the charioteer just follows.</p>
<p>Wherever the &#8220;Buddhi&#8221; dominates the power of will is seen. It is the &#8220;Buddhi&#8221; &#8211; the Power of discrimination to be cultivated to attain the higher intellect. The greater the Self-Control, the Greater the Buddhi.</p>
<p>People are generally heard saying, &#8220;Kathopanishad says God is everywhere, then why cannot we see God?&#8221; In simple words, not everybody can see God. We are not competent &#8220;<em>Yogyata</em>&#8221; to see God. We need to develop the competence to see God. When a person has developed that &#8220;Dhee&#8221; &#8211; intellect and courage &#8211; only then can he make the search of <em>Shashwatha Shantihi</em> &#8211; Eternal Peace.</p>
<p>In their ignorance people make the sin of considering, the changing as the Unchanging, impure as the Pure, Source of unhappiness as happiness and loss of Eternal Reality is mistaken to be Eternal Reality (meaning that Body is considered to be The <em>Aatma</em>) .</p>
<p>The Original Sin is to consider the Body as the <em>Aatma</em>. After this sin happens, everything else just follows. Once a person is into this Sin, he gets only ephemeral happiness.</p>
<p>Camels have this desire for thorny plants for food. Whenever they eat those plants they are happy that they are eating what they wanted. But those thorns prick their mouth and they start bleeding. This is ephemeral happiness.</p>
<p>He, who has the ability to discriminate the Eternal from the ephemeral, destructible from the indestructible and is able to find Nitya amidst Anitya is the one will experience Shashwatha Shantihi eternal peace and not the others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mysorean.com/2006/08/06/ramakrishna-ashram-discourse-on-kathopanishads-part-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ramakrishna Ashram &#124; Discourse on kathopanishads Part I</title>
		<link>http://www.mysorean.com/2006/08/06/ramakrishna-ashram-discourse-on-kathopanishads-part-i/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mysorean.com/2006/08/06/ramakrishna-ashram-discourse-on-kathopanishads-part-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 02:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mysorean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discourses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hinduism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spirituality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysorean.com/2006/08/06/ramakrishna-ashram-discourse-on-kathopanishads-part-i/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a long time I attended the discourse at Ramakrishna Ashram on Kathopanishads by Swami Atmashraddhananda. Here is a write-up of whatever I understood there. Swamiji started off with reading out the sloka and then started explaining it in his inimitable style of raising questions and answering them. Those who have not known the (nitya [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>After a long time I attended the discourse at Ramakrishna Ashram on Kathopanishads by Swami Atmashraddhananda. Here is a write-up of whatever I understood there. Swamiji started off with reading out the sloka and then started explaining it in his inimitable style of raising questions and answering them.</em></p>
<p>Those who have not known the (<em>nitya </em>in sanskrit)<strong>Reality</strong> of eternal truth will never find peace &#8211; eternal happiness in other words. As long as we think that <strong>Reality</strong> and we are something different we will never see it. <strong>Reality</strong> is inside us, rather reality is us and we are reality. This <strong>Reality</strong> is permanent, it has no beginning and has no end. Hence it is the <strong>ONE</strong>. Eternal peace is for those who see the <strong>Reality</strong> and not for those who discriminate.</p>
<p>Spirituality is a <em>quest</em> for the <strong>Reality</strong>. It begins with the <em>question</em> &#8220;Is there something <strong>Real</strong> in this world?&#8221; and finding the answer is the end of the journey. Let&#8217;s take the learning curve of a child for example. He begins with an understanding of the moving and the non-moving. <em>A cat moves and a table doesn&#8217;t</em>. Pleasurable and not-pleasurable is the next stage. Here he does not think whether it is beneficial or not, it is all about pleasure. Next stage is Good or Bad. And so on there are various stages. But very few people can come up with the question of Real or Unreal.</p>
<p>More often than not, when a person undergoes a very strong experience is when he comes to this question of Real and Unreal. For others it is just between pleasant and unpleasant. For others it is all matter(that which can be sensed through our senses). But as per our Upanishads and other Holy writings of the Hindu Religion and according to the Lord Yama, it is <em>Nitya</em> from which everything has come. All material is a form of thought. The Upanishad thought varies from the mechanistic thought in this manner about <em>Nitya</em>.</p>
<p>He, who has the ability to discriminate the Eternal from the ephemeral, destructible from the indestructible and is able to find Nitya amidst Anitya is the one will experience <em>Shashwatha Shantihi</em> eternal peace.</p>
<p>A small story to better understand eternity and the ephemeraless. The Lord of Rightenousness Yama wanted to teach the Pandavas a lesson. While under exile, the Pandavas wandering in the forests felt thirsty and so they rested under a tree. Yudhishthira instructed Nakula and Sahadeva to find if there was any water source nearby.</p>
<p>Nakula and Sahadeva climbed to the top of trees and surveyed the surrounding. They couldn&#8217;t find any water <em>per se</em> but they saw a certain kind of trees that grew only near water sources. <em>This also points to the knowledge of flora and fauna that the people of those times had.</em> They inform Yudhishtira about the same and they proceed towards the spot to find a lake.</p>
<p>In the meantime, Lord Yama has taken the form of a stork and is standing nearby the lake. Sahadeva proceeds to get water for all of them. Then the stork speaks. <em>Ok, let&#8217;s just assume that they understood each other&#8217;s language if you find a stork speaking to be so illogical. It is an altogether different topic that we don&#8217;t understand a fellow human being&#8217;s language itself! A stronger indication of the harmonious living between the flora and fauna and the human beings.</em></p>
<blockquote><p>The stork says, &#8220;I will ask you a few questions. After you answer them<br />
successfully, you may take water from here and go&#8221;.</p></blockquote>
<p>But Sahadeva is in such a thirsty state and also seeing his family members state he just ignores the stork and bends down to collect water. As soon as he comes in contact with the water, he falls down dead! The same fate befalls Nakula, Bheema and Arjuna.</p>
<p>After waiting for an inordinately long time, Yudhishtira himself makes it to the lake and encounters the stork. Immediately he realises that it&#8217;s not an ordinary stork. And he pauses to take the quiz voluntered by the stork. This quiz is the famous <strong>&#8220;Yaksha Prashna&#8221;</strong> that we have come to know of. One question in that quiz was related to eternity and ephemralness.</p>
<blockquote><p>The Stork (in-the-form-of-Lord Yama) asked, &#8220;What is the latest<br />
wonder?&#8221;<br />
Yudhishthira answers, &#8220;People die daily around us yet no one believes that<br />
he is going to die&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Later on, Lord Yama shows his true form to Yudhishtira after being pleased with his answers. And also brings all his brothers back to life.</p>
<p>The point here is that, we are Eternal (<em>Nitya</em>). But this Body is not. We realize that we are eternal but restrict the understanding to our body-mind consciousness and hence we are fearful. When we approach Divinty we become fearless. Identification with Anitya is why we never see the Eternal Truth.</p>
<p><em>Continued in Part &#8211; II. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mysorean.com/2006/08/06/ramakrishna-ashram-discourse-on-kathopanishads-part-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
